Defining the resistance in Iraq - it's not foreign and it's well prepared
UN weapons inspector saw 'blueprints' for Monday's insurgency

* Accuses mainstream media of fuelling unhappiness by reporting mostly bad news from Iraq*
So Journalists should not tell the truth now??
Brushing aside the embarrassing failure of US troops to find the weapons he made the centrepiece of his case for military action, Bush said the invasion thwarted future plots against the United States by “madman” Saddam Hussein. “Saddam Hussein was a gathering threat. He possessed and he used weapons of mass destruction,” he declared here. “I was not about to leave the security of the United States to the desires and hopes of this madman.”

The exercise cost $300m. And the number of weapons found? 0
Five months after the end of the war in Iraq, a CIA adviser has admitted that his 1,200-strong team of inspectors has discovered none of Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction.

On September 16, Bush got his way when the US Senate voted to allow research into smaller nuclear weapons that could be used in battlefield situations. The so-called "bunker buster" mini-nukes would, in theory, be used to destroy command and control bunkers buried deep underground.

 Last May, President Bush made his now-famous -- and outrageously false -- statement to a Polish television station: "We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories.... But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them."

When Bush jr. said, "we will smoke them out…" he lived up to his promise, making life an unattainable reality for the unborn and unsustainable reality for the living sentencing the Afghan people and
their future generations to a predetermined death sentence.     All they don't tell you about D.U. Weapons

A former US military researcher tells Gay Alcorn of his crusade to expose the health risks of depleted-uranium weapons used in the Gulf wars.
Doug Rokke sits on the edge of his chair in a beige, could-be-anywhere hotel room in Carlton. He stares at you with an almost embarrassing intensity and is close to tears.
"It's lonely," he says slowly. "It's very lonely. I made a decision. I was given a job. I did my job. I learned something. I gave them an answer they didn't want. I became persona non grata. And the better parts of my life ended."

In the weeks leading up to the war on Iraq, TV screens across America were crowded with images of U.S. soldiers readying for upcoming battles with a crazed dictator who would stop at nothing. One clip after another showed U.S. soldiers racing to don $211 suits designed to protect them from the chemical and biological attacks they would surely suffer on the road to ousting Saddam Hussein.

Americans deserve to know the truth about why we went to war in Iraq. Click here to take action now and send a message to President Bush and Senator Pat Roberts demanding a full investigation into the intelligence Bush relied upon when he argued that Iraq presented an imminent threat to the United States.

Topic: Commander-In-Thief Bush Must Step Down
George W. Bush told us that Iraq and Al Qaeda were working together. They weren't. He repeatedly implied that Iraq had had something to do with 9/11. It hadn't. He claimed to have proof that Saddam Hussein possessed banned weapons of mass destruction. He didn't. As our allies watched in horror and disgust, Bush conned us into a one-sided war of aggression that killed and maimed thousands of innocent people, destroyed billions of dollars in Iraqi infrastructure, cost tens of billions of dollars, cost the lives of American soldiers, and transformed our international image as the world's shining beacon of freedom into that of a marauding police state. Presidents Nixon and Clinton rightly faced impeachment for comparatively trivial offenses; if we hope to restore our nation's honor, George W. Bush too must face a president's gravest political sanction.

1.
2.

3.
4.

 WMD just a convenient excuse for war, admits Wolfowitz Independent, UK May 30
Robin Cook: Britain must not be suckered a second time by the White House - The British government needs to concede that we went to war for reasons of US foreign policy and Republican Party politics Independent, UK May 30
British, US claims on Iraq's WMD could be intelligence blunder Straits Times, Singapore May 30
Government blames spies over war Independent, UK May 30

  "The term "Weapons of Mass Destruction" (WMD) was long reserved for nuclear explosives, which release upon detonation a million times more energy per weight than conventional explosives like TNT.
More recently, though, and especially now in reference to Iraq, WMD has been expanded to include chemical and biological weapons. This is decidedly misleading terminology, because the three types of weapons are fundamentally differenct in terms of lethality, in the area they cover and over time; in the availability of measures that can protect against them; and in their potential tactical, strategic, and terrorist uses."

Scientists debate depleted uranium weapons' possible
contamination of Iraqi civilians

Since the US and the UK are having such a hard time finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, we thought we'd lend a
hand by providing this easy guide to the nukes we know about.

A myth equal to the fable of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction is gaining strength on both sides of the Atlantic. It is that John Kerry offers a world-view different from that of George W Bush. Watch this big lie grow as Kerry is crowned the Democratic candidate and the "anyone but Bush" movement becomes a liberal cause celebre.

of My Lai Massacre
In his radio address on March 15, "DUBYA" Bush reminded his listeners the next day to be the 15th "bitter anniversary" of Saddam Hussein's chemical weapons attack on the Iraqi Kurdish village of Halabja. Bush reportedly called Saddam as
one of the "most cruel dictator in the history".
But in fact it is the USA that militarily helped and equipped Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war. And it is American LaFarge company that provided Iraq with chemical weapon materials. It is reported that "Papa" Bush was the owner and Hillary Clinton was a director of this company. Moreover, the very claim that Kurdish people of Halabja were killed by Iraq's toxic gas was found to be fake.   NY Times

The Blair Government has known, almost from the day it came to office in 1997, that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction were almost certainly destroyed following the Gulf War.
Of all the pro-war propaganda of Blair and Bush, and their current threats giving Saddam Hussein yet another deadline to disarm, what may be their biggest lie is exposed by this revelation.                                 ......More Articles by John Pilger          

The Diversion of Rhetoric Over Reason

A War Crime or an Act of War?
MECHANICSBURG, Pa. — It was no surprise that President Bush, lacking smoking-gun evidence of Iraq's weapons programs, used his State of the Union address to re-emphasize the moral case for an invasion: "The dictator who is assembling the world's most dangerous weapons has already used them on whole villages, leaving thousands of his own citizens dead, blind or disfigured."