|
|
Close Help | ||||||||||||||
|
US Analyst Predicts Another US-Staged 9/11 To Justify War On Iran Comment by Larry Ross, March 30, 2007
Heather Wokusch, M.A. in Clinical Psychology, is an educator, journalist and writes extensively on US political developments, wars and nuclear issues. Her following article has similar conclusions to mine and other writers on the preliminary strategies the US is likely to use to justify its War On Iran. All the indications are that the US will soon massively strike Iran, including the probable use of nuclear weapons. The US military forces including ground, sea with 3 aircraft carrier groups, and US air bases surround Iran. With US nuclear weapons and missiles ready to fire, Iran casualties could be in the millions. Allies, such as Tony Blair's UK, are helping set the war machine in motion by provoking Iran with a UK naval intrusion incident in the Gulf. Tony Blair lied to get UK public support for military aid to the US-led war on Iraq. He has consistently lied and repeated George Bush lies about Iraq and Iran. He has already engaged in all manner of plots to covertly invade Iran with special UK military operatives. Now he is engaged in lying to cover the UK provocation in the Gulf. As he was with the Iraq war, Tony Blair is a very talented, convincing, honest-looking liar on Iran issues. Britain had a big Imperial Empire, so it has hundreds of years experience in creating convincing excuses to invade, infiltrate, conquer and rule other people's countries. The British people have always embraced their leaders Imperial wars. The UK is happy to follow and work with the US, the new Imperial world leader, on its wars of expansion and domination in Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and others to follow. Almost any excuses, no matter how improbable and flimsy, will be sufficient if the mass media keep repeating the lies and only publish token or no opposition. The basis strategy to fool the British people is to keep up a veneer of civilization and law, while embracing the real world of illegal wars, torture, illegal imprisonment, and even the use of nuclear weapons. It is especially important that Blair was willing to threaten Saddam Hussein with UK nuclear weapons if he resisted the US-UK invasion with anything the US-UK classed as weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Look at this again: Blair was willing to kill any number of people, in support of his, and Bush's lies which they invented to justify invading Iraq . Look at it again: These two liars and their administrations are willing to make war on Iraq and Iran based on their lies and covert actions, thereby risking escalation to a world war III which could kill millions, if not billions of people. Having established themselves as war criminals over Iraq, both now with declining popularity, are desperate men - like bank robbers on the verge of being discovered. They will do anything to carry forward the neocon plan to dominate the Middle East and more, and thus prevail on the home front as 'great democratic liberators' etc. who then cancel elections and stay in power indefinitely. Israel 's leaders are even worse and pursue their objective of US war with Iran with great diligence and unlimited funds, thanks to US taxpayers $3 billion/ year 'aid'. Criminal psychopath administrations who lie to make war and kill millions, now control at least 3 of the world's nuclear arsenals - the US, UK and Israel. They have demonstrated that they are willing to risk World War III and their entire populations, to satisfy their greed and achieve their military ambitions. France may join in if escalation occurs. That leaves Russia and China who have links to Iran , and Pakistan, India and North Korea. That's nine nuclear weapon nations. How will Russia, China and Pakistan react if the US kills millions in a nuclear attack on Iran? Will they be afraid they are next, and commit national suicide by retaliating against the US? Once wars of this size and unprecedented destruction begin, with nuclear arsenals on a hair trigger, first strike basis, with instant decisions demanded in this 'fog of war and uncertainty', it is likely that events will quickly escalate out of control. This is the scenario we all face today. What is needed is a huge education campaign to acquaint Americans and others around the world, to the historical realities of false flag covert operations - staged by a nation to fake an enemy attack on their own people, in order to provoke their people's hatred and support for a war of retaliation against that enemy. Search Google using "False Flag" for some amazing facts. This is what Helen Wokusch thinks Bush will do to get US public and Congressional support for a war on Iran . If he does it, the momentum of expanding wars may take over all other agendas. There will be no going back, no investigation of why etc. Martial law will probably follow, and ensure no criticism or questions or doubting analysis articles are allowed. If a World War III is triggered, it may destroy the world. If Bush, Blair and others prevail without triggering a World War III, they will emerge with a conquered area, but with millions of decaying dead and millions of wounded, starving, radiated victims - innocent men, women and children. Surely this scenario will encourage people to take some preventative action. In this age of useable nuclear weapons, and 'legal' pre-emptive nuclear strikes on both nuclear and non-nuclear nations, we have all become direct or indirect targets. Our apathy and denial may allow it to happen. You can help educate others by forwarding this email to others, and to groups and publications. Educate yourself about False Flag covert operations. Each recipient can continue forwarding this email. It will be much harder for Bush and Blair to stage successful false flag operations if people know the past history of this evil strategy, and how likely it is to be used as indicated below.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Easter Surprise: Attack on Iran, New 9/11… or Worse by
Heather Wokusch, March 29, 2007 “There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.” – George W. Bush, September 2002 The Bush administration continues moving closer to a nuclear attack on Iran, and we ignore the obvious buildup at our peril. Russian media is sounding alarms. In February, ultra-nationalist leader Vladimir Shirinovsky warned that the US would launch a strike against Tehran at the end of this month. Then last week, the Russian News and Information Agency Novosti (RIA-Novosti) quoted military experts predicting the US will attack Iran on April 6th, Good Friday. According to RIA-Novosti, the imminent assault will target Iranian air and naval defense capabilities, armed forces headquarters as well as key economic assets and administration headquarters. Massive air strikes will be deployed, possibly tactical nuclear weapons as well, and the Bush administration will attempt to exploit the resulting chaos and political unrest by installing a pro-US government. Sound familiar? It's Iraq Déjà vu all over again, and we know how well that war has gone. Seymour Hersh has published numerous articles in The New Yorker detailing the Bush administration's plans to invade Iran. His latest, " The Redirection ," discusses US participation in Iran-based clandestine operations, the kidnapping of hundreds of Iranians (including many "humanitarian and aid workers") by US forces and the shocking revelation that an Iran-Contra-type scandal has been run out of Vice President Dick Cheney's office with some of the illicit funds going to groups "sympathetic to al-Qaeda." "The Redirection" also reports that the Pentagon has been planning to bomb Iran for a year and that a recently-established group connected to the Joint Chiefs of Staff is formulating a assault strategy to be implemented "upon orders from the President, within twenty-four hours." Hersh notes that current capabilities "allow for an attack order this spring," possibly when four US aircraft-carrier battle groups are scheduled to be in the Persian Gulf simultaneously. Meanwhile, the Democratic Congress busies itself with non-binding, timid resolutions on Iraq and recently altered a military-funding bill to make it easier for Bush to invade Iran. As Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-NV) explained, language demanding that Bush seek congressional approval before attacking Iran " would take away perhaps the most important negotiating tool that the U.S. has when it comes to Iran." Such sheer ignorance and blind denial would be laughable if it weren't marching us into Armageddon. But with this Administration (and this Congress, apparently) diplomacy be damned. It's now widely known that Iran had broached peace talks with the US in 2003 - Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice admitted as much in 2006 when she said, "what the Iranians wanted earlier was to be one-on-one with the United States." Yet the White House rejected Tehran's overture outright and Rice has since developed selective amnesia, later saying of the Iranian proposal, I don't remember seeing any such thing. " See Also:
|
|||||||||||||||
