|
Can We Win Against Bush Empire? Comment by Larry Ross, July 17, 2005
Morgan Reynolds, past member of the Bush Administration, now exposing the crimes of that Administration, claims we can win against the huge power of the Bush Administration. As he points out, many powerful government agencies are helping Bush commit his crimes. They are deeply involved and have a strong incentive to keep on with the act at whatever cost. Will they suddenly be appalled at what they have been lured into and turn honest? Let's hope so and Reynold's faith that enough will talk to impeach Bush is inspiring. An ominous factor is mysterious deaths of 9/11 investigators. That may stop some. If Morgan is right - that 9/11 was organised by the Bush Administration to provide phoney justification for the middle east wars; and that the overriding 'war on terrorism' is as phoney a story as was ever concocted, we have a very deeply-ingrained problem. I agree with Reynolds that a bigger 9/11-type of attack is likely prior to Bush's launch of the war on Iran. I think Bush will stage a series of quick phoney reactions to this phoney event and end up turning the U.S. into a tightly-controlled fascist military state before people have a chance to catch there breath and take any action. The war on Iran could see U.S. conscription and marshal law in the U.S. It could mean confinement for dissenters and objectors in Bush's newly built conscription centres in the U.S. These new conditions could make it very difficult if not impossible to launch impeachment proceedings, particularly if there was a removal and silencing of key critics, in and out of government. Whatever considerations people have, they should remember one central fact; If the Bush Administration is not stopped very soon, it may take the world into a nuclear war that can quickly escalate and end all life on earth.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Risk of Winning: Morgan Reynolds - April 9, 2006
I have begun receiving a handful of emails and questions from callers to radio interview shows that worry about our forthcoming victory in the 9/11 information war! What will happen once the 9/11 traitors are exposed, goes the lament, and an outraged public demands a pound of flesh from each conspirator? Scary huh? First, will we have this delicious problem to deal with? Yes, we are going to win and so we will face this “problem” for a variety of sturdy reasons. The most important is that the establishment's preposterous conspiracy theory of 9/11—ONYA (Osama and Nineteen Young Arabs)—lies in total ruins, completely and thoroughly shredded by hundreds of websites on the internet and a handful of books like David Ray Griffin's The New Pearl Harbor and Webster G. Tarpley's 9/11 Synthetic Terror. The perpetrators, filled with hubris and contempt for the American people, seriously underestimated what a few hundred internet researchers could do. The public flight from ONYA has been accelerated by exposure of the government's lies on Iraq, its failed invasion and the consequent unpopularity of the Bush-Cheney regime. The public relations outfall has not been contained and has spilled over to eat away at the lies of 9/11. Charlie Sheen's brave testimony has put us on a new level of public awareness. Second, what really is the worry? Isn't this what we are working for, the prospect of justice obtained by exposure of the truth, the prospect of stopping the killers in their tracks? Yes, it is. Anyone fretting over the triumph of truth should ask this question: what do you do with a family dog who kills a family member? The dog was acquired to protect the family and instead it kills someone it was supposed to protect. The services of such a dog would no longer be required, to put it as gently as possible. That's the situation we have with the DoD, NSA, CIA, FBI and a murderous array of government agencies, including the 9/11 Commission. The 9/11 Commission members and staff director Philip D. Zelikow are accessories after the fact, a felony crime. Selected elements of many organizations lied and murdered thousands of innocent Americans. Every member of the military swears an oath to defend and protect the Constitution, against enemies “both foreign and domestic.” Pretending that nothing happened after the family pet murdered a family member would be madness, intolerable, a “head-in-the-sand” absurdity, not to mention a constant menace for everybody in the dog's ambit. That's our predicament today: the overt and covert types hired to protect us turned and killed family members and remain on the loose and in power. They must be taken down. Or this too hard to understand?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conspiracy and Closed Minds on 9/11 by Morgan Reynolds, March 15, 2006 While more Americans doubt the 9/11 story every week, evidence abounds that many have a mental block against rational examination of the evidence about 9/11. The possibility that it was an inside job is a non-starter for them. Programmed “cut outs” insure that 9/11 doubts are consigned to the “conspiracy” closet. Last June I was explaining the fuss over my 9/11 article to a family member who shall remain anonymous and he interrupted and said, “I don't want to talk about it.” Millions join him in that sentiment. By implication they might as well say: “I'd rather cling to the official 9/11 myth” = “If mass murderers run free, I'm fine with that” = “If 9/11 was an inside job, then I'm ruled by monsters and I might have to do something about it, I'd rather watch Paris Hilton.” Where does this passive attitude come from? Causes are many but American indoctrination has two sides that figure prominently in the explanation:
|
