|
|
Close Help | ||||||||||||||
|
Is This The Greatest Conspiracy in History?
Larry Ross, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WING Spotlight Interview: John Kaminski by Victor Thorn & Lisa Guliani, May 1, 2004
John Kamninski: The hijackers have turned out to be the litmus issue in the entire spectrum of 9/11 questions. Anybody who's talking about hijackers doesn't "get it," as the Kean commission so vividly demonstrates. There is not now nor has there even been legal proof that Arab hijackers perpetrated the 9/11 horror. They could not be convicted of the crime in an honest court of law ("honest," of course, ruling out all U.S. courts). If Bush had real evidence, don't you think he would have produced it? Atta and the others were most likely Israeli Arabs posing as faux-hijackers to give the real perpetrators a believable cover story for their demolition-for-money of the World Trade Center. Recruiting them was a stroke of genius which served several purposes: (1) inflaming public opinion against the Islamic world to ease continuing aggression against the Arab states; (2) diverting the world media focus from the continuing Israeli extermination of the Palestinians; and (3) concealing the identity of the true perpetrators — some of whom are certainly members of the Council on Foreign Relations — behind the emotional distress of the American people deceptively mobilized to seek revenge against dark-skinned foreigners. 2) What are your thoughts on the possibility that explosive devices were planted in the World Trade Center, and that they ultimately brought the towers down, not heat caused by burning jet fuel? John Kamninski: The photographic evidence presented on plaguepuppy.com, wtc7.net and thewebfairy.com convincingly depicts movement of flying debris from various parts of the collapsing structures that appears to be inconsistent with government statements that the buildings fell because of the plane impacts and ensuing fires. Failure of trusses, moreover, would not have resulted in the uniform collapse that we saw. The fires that were claimed to be hot enough to deform the joints that supposedly buckled to trigger the collapse certainly were not substantial, according to the photographic evidence. The likelihood that all corners of key floors disconnected at the same time is utterly impossible. Seismic evidence and reports from firefighters both on the ground and on the upper floors provide evidence of extraneous explosions that have never been adequately explained. Hundreds of germane questions — from strange power outages in the days before 9/11 to sudden vacancies and strange people in the building prior to collapse — have not been adequately addressed by law enforcement. And the fact that WTC7, not struck by any plane, collapsed in the same manner as the two towers that WERE struck by planes, has made skeptics the world over believe that all three were demolished using the same techniques. No steel structure of this type has ever before been destroyed by fire, but on this day, three of them were. The absence of an investigation into these unexpected building failures and the concealment of evidence by removing debris from the scene before proper forensic techniques could be applied are strong circumstantial evidence of probable cause for charges of obstruction of justice, accessory to mass murder, and treason for many federal and state officials. 3) Likewise, the Boeing 767-Pentagon cover story seems more ludicrous each day. What are a few specifics that most people need to know about this phenomenon? John Kamninski: It has always been about the tiny hole, and the unbroken windows surrounding the supposed point of impact. An explosion seems to have occurred before anything hit the building, if anything actually hit the building. It doesn't matter whether a guided missile, a Global Hawk or a jet fighter hit the Pentagon after the initial explosion. Clearly, none of them was a jetliner. It's about the hole. It's way to small. Rescue teams were prevented from rescue attempts. Parts were found — that seemed planted — that didn't match the specifications of the plane the government says hit the building. Video cameras were impounded by the government in the name of national security that could answer all these questions. The government is withholding them because they show no jetliner hit the building. The government claims to have DNA-identified all the passengers on the plane, yet no remains were given to families for funerals. The identity of the Pentagon employees who were killed have never been publicized, but reportedly some were part of a Naval intelligence team threatening to blow the whistle on Cheney's crimes. The point about investigating 9/11 is to find ONE fact that does not match the official story, proving the government's account is a lie. There are hundreds of facts that don't match the official story. The Pentagon lie is probably the most glaring one, and the easiest to prove. Just take those photographs to a jury. They wouldn't deliberate very long. No jetliner hit the Pentagon. 4) The progressive/liberal “independent” media has yet to differ much on the “official” 9-11 version of events that have been conveyed by the government and mainstream corporate media. Please give us an overview of these “Left Gatekeepers” and their sources of financing. John Kamninski: Left Gatekeepers is correct. Best accounts are at questionsquestions.net and leftgatekeepers.net. From Chomsky to Amy Goodman, from Pacifica Radio to Common Dreams, from The Progressive to The Nation, these publications are all silent on 9/11 — at least on the truly salient points — because they receive funding from the power elite, funneled from the CIA through for Ford Foundation and other establishment financial mechanisms. It's a tragedy that the phony concern of these liberal shills actually helps Bush and his neocon criminals cover up their atrocities more than the blatantly fascist mainstream press because they motivate the liberal opposition to fragment their focus onto relatively trivial issues — e.g., Haiti instead of Palestine — and limit the spectrum of debate by not mentioning certain important area for investigation — most notably 9/11. The left almost unanimously buys into the hijacker myth. Bush couldn't be happier about that. 5) Many Democrats have placed quite a bit of hope in John Kerry to “save them” from the current Bush administration. Tell us your views on this fellow Skull & Bonesman to George W. Bush. John Kamninski: How does it come to be that one college fraternity with 800 members can claim both major presidential candidates in the year 2004 in a country with 300 million people? It is clearly because the United States of America is neither a democracy nor a republic, but a plutocracy of the rich in which the concepts of freedom and representative government are only dangerous and misguided illusions, and everything is really run by a very small group of very rich and very white European nobles. The only people who can be elected to Congress or given a judgeship are those who can prove they are willing to commit crimes on behalf of those with the real money who really run the show. Ordinary people are ineligible for positions of power in most instances, unless they prove their allegiances to the forces of darkness who run everything. In a sense, Kerry is a more dangerous candidate than Bush — in the same way that Clinton was — because his polite dialogue with the so-called left tends to obscure vicious American imperialism. What happened in Yugoslavia — every bit as bad as what is happening to Iraq — is a good example. From what I've read about Skull & Bones — and this is what both Bush and Kerry are trying to keep secret — members have to profess allegiance to the devil, participate in truly horrifying rituals, and lay in a coffin while members play with each other's penises. All of this videotaped to be able to blackmail members down the line when they get into positions of power. It is truly devil worship. And these are the people who are running our country. No wonder we're killing people all over the world and saying it's defending democracy. Both major presidential candidates are demon worshippers, a fact well-known to most people in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and other besieged places. 6) An increasing number of Americans are turning to alternative, independent news sources for information, particularly in regard to the “war on terror” in Iraq. Also, give us your take on how the media incorporates mental conditioning into their daily news programs. John Kamninski: 9/11 set a new tone for media manipulation. Amid all those tragic scenes, it became impermissable to point out all the crimes of concealment that took place right after that tragic day. Destroying the evidence, saying the air was OK to breathe, not questioning officials for fear of being called unpatriotic — what a perfect cover for a whole barrage of crimes. America's government is a criminal enterprise. Mainstream media never hints at such a possibility, because they are all owned by the same people who are committing these colossal crimes. The American people are in big trouble because there is no law enforcement anymore against those who control the the government and big businesses. Little people can be put in jail for no particular reason. Rich people never go to jail. Just look at Kenneth Lay and Dick Cheney, two of the biggest criminals in America. Mainstream media never even hints that this might be a problem. And most people don't believe anything unless they see it on television. The problem is that everything on television is a lie, meant to ease the task of those who are doing the stealing. Primarily, the mental condition employed by big media reinforces the idea that America is still a representative democracy, when in fact it is not. It represents only a small number of powerful corporations, who with the help of the media have been able to change the laws to suit themselves. There is a robbery that has been going on for a long time and is now accelerating. It is siphoning all the cash and all the resources from the American citizenry into the coffers of the large corporations. The objective is elimination of democracy and concentration of all the money, resources and power into this very small group of people. This has already been achieved. Even the freedom between you and me to have this conversation will surely not last much longer. The slave society is already here. Most people are just too stupid to notice, and they got that way watching television and reading mainstream media. But it's too late now. The fascist neocon vigilantes will be coming to rub us out for good, any day now. The game is over. You'll either be a prisoner or a guard. None of this could have been achieved without mainstream media. And the alternatives, brave hearts. They'll be dead soon too. Most of the so-called alternative newspapers in the United States have all been bought up by chains and don't talk about politics at all. A few do, but in a politically acceptable way that is only a step removed from the mainstream media mindlock. Those few courageous Internet news sites where you and I get most of our genuine news — Rense, What Really Happened, American Patriot Friends Network, Serendipity, WING-TV etc. — they're all dying the slow death of poverty. A majority of Americans doesn't really care about real news. They won't until it's too late, until they go to the bank one day and can't get their money out. Then they'll say, "We should have listened to what Victor and John were saying." But they were too busy with NASCAR and Pilates and American Idol. It's probably too late. The only thing can save the world is a worldwide revolution to regain control of the money supply, throw the entire government as well as mainstream media in jail for obstruction of justice and accessory to mass murder. But it'll never happen. Because somebody on TV isn't saying it. John Kaminski is the author of "America's Autopsy Report," a collection of his Internet essays seen on hundreds of websites around the world, and also of "The Day America Died: Why You Shouldn't Believe the Official Version of What Happened on September 11, 2001," a 48-page booklet written for those who insist on believing what the government has told them about 9/11. For more information about both, go to http://www.johnkaminski.com/ |
