FRIENDS OF THE EARTH AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN PEACE COMMITTEE
CAMPAIGN FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND DISARMAMENT (CICD)

DOUBLE-STANDARD AS U.S. SENATE SUPPORTS NEW NUCLEAR WEAPONS,
SUBCRITICAL NUKE TEST PLANNED TODAY.

Australian peace groups have called both a US Senate vote yesterday that allows a go-ahead for new nuclear weapons designs, as well as a subcritical nuclear test planned for today, a double standard that violates US obligations under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty(NPT). The US recently boycotted a meeting to facilitate the entry into force of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which would end all nuclear tests.

According to the Australian Peace Committee, CICD, and Friends of the Earth,
"The US attitude to nuclear testing and its funding of new nuclear weapons designs shows that it simply is not serious over the elimination of nuclear weapons.

As US Senator Feinstien says, 'By seeking to develop new nuclear weapons ourselves we send a message that nuclear weapons have a future battlefield role and utility.'
While according to US Senator Edward Kennedy,
'At the very time when we are urging other nations to halt their own nuclear weapons programs, the administration is rushing forward to develop our own new nuclear weapons,'

Australian peace groups continued:
"The double-standard could not be more clear. How can the US ask Iran and North Korea to renounce nuclear weapons when it is conducting research into new nuclear weapons itself, in violation of its obligation under the NPT to achieve the complete and unequivocal elimination of those weapons? How can it threaten the DPRK if they test, when today itself it has scheduled a subcritical nuclear test, when it plans a series of such tests next year that will be much closer to actual explosive testing, and when it has boycotted the CTBT?

If the US is serious on nuclear nonproliferation it must first of all deliver on its own obligations under the NPT, and achieve the elimination of its own nuclear arsenal as it has been legally obliged to do for more than 30 years."

Contact:
John Hallam Friends of the Earth Australia 02-9567-7533 h9810-2598
Irene Gale AM 08-8364-2291
Pauline Mitchell CICD 03-9336-3677


ABC News - US plans first sub-nuclear test in 12 months

http://www.abc.net.au/news/justin/weekly/newsnat-17sep2003-58.htm

Posted :Wed, 17 Sep 2003 20:08 AEST

The United States will conduct a subcritical nuclear experiment at its Nevada test site on Thursday, the first time since September 26 last year, the US Energy Department said Tuesday.

It will be the twentieth such test since 1997 and the seventh since President George W Bush took the office in 2001.

The tests have been strongly criticized as undermining the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.

President Bush senior issued a moratorium on full-scale nuclear tests in 1982.

The department has been planning a new kind of subcritical test next year but it says this test will employ the method used up to now.

Subcritical tests use small amounts of nuclear materials and are designed to stop short of triggering nuclear reactions.

They allow scientists to study how materials, such as plutonium, blow apart when detonated with high explosives.

The department said the tests ''produce essential scientific data and technical information used to help maintain the safety and reliability of the nuclear weapons stockpile.''

The latest test, dubbed Piano, will be conducted at the base of a vertical shaft about 290 metres beneath the surface of the test, the department said.

-- Kyodo


Senate OK's Bush plans for nuclear weapons research

By Nick Anderson, Los Angeles Times, 9/17/2003

WASHINGTON -- The Senate yesterday approved Bush administration plans to research new battlefield uses for nuclear weapons and improve the nation's capacity to make and test them.

The 53-41 vote to retain funding for the plan, powered by the administration's Republican allies, set up an unusual intraparty fight on Capitol Hill. The GOP-led House voted in July for legislation that would strip at least $16 million from Bush's nuclear weapons initiatives.

The Senate debate yesterday centered on whether the administration would be building nuclear bombs anytime soon. Democrats say things are moving rapidly in that direction; Republicans insist the administration's moves are only prudent planning.

The vote occurred before lawmakers approved a $27.9 billion bill funding the Energy Department and other programs in the fiscal year that begins next month.

"There's nothing in this bill that produces a single new nuclear weapon," said Senator Pete V. Domenici, Republican of New Mexico, whose state is home to critical weapons installations.

But Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, insisted otherwise. "This is the beginning," she said. "This money will go to field a new generation of nuclear weapons. We should not do this."

Feinstein and Senator Edward M. Kennedy had proposed an amendment to remove from the energy bill $15 million for research on an earth-penetrating nuclear weapon and $6 million for research on other "advanced concepts,"
including low-yield bombs.

Federal law for the past decade has prohibited research on such bombs, which carry an explosive force of five kilotons or less. But Congress, at the administration's urging, appears to be on the verge of repealing that prohibition. The bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945 had an estimated yield of 12.5 kilotons.

Feinstein said the research would open the door to a new arms race among nations that see the United States as a superpower seeking to expand its nuclear capabilities. Domenici derided what he called an effort to "put
blinders" on US scientists.

The amendment sponsored by Feinstein and Kennedy also would have blocked administration efforts to reduce the amount of time it would need to resume nuclear testing at an underground site in Nevada. The site requires up to
three years before any test could be conducted. The administration wants to cut that timetable in half, even though officials said there were no plans to end a testing moratorium in place since 1992.

The California Democrat also sought to delay long-range plans for the construction of a facility to produce plutonium "pits," trigger-like devices that are a component in thermonuclear bombs.

Five Democrats joined 48 Republicans in voting to kill Feinstein's amendment. They were Evan Bayh of Indiana, Zell Miller of Georgia, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Bill Nelson of Florida, and Ernest F. Hollings of South Carolina, whose state is a candidate for the new pit-production site.

 

Home     Disclaimer/Fair Use