Russian Defence Chief Warns About US Nuclear Attack on Iran |
Comment by Larry Ross |
January 25, 2007 |
|
Russian Ex-Chief of Defence, General Ivashov's analysis is very similar to many articles on our website and in my comments. I think it is one of the most informed professional analysis so far of US intentions to nuclear bomb Iran. He even refers to a pretext or what many have referred to as a "False Flag" incident to get the Senate and Congress to give their approval for a nuclear attack on Iran. The article should convince people that now is the time to take action if they wish to prevent a US nuclear attack on Iran and all the disastrous consequences that can follow. I can't see any effective action or purpose in protest after such an attack when casualties are already in the millions with perhaps many more to come. |
Iran Must Get Ready to Repel a Nuclear Attack |
by Leonid Ivashov, Global Research |
January 24, 2007 |
|
In the overall flow of information coming from the Middle East, there are increasingly frequent reports indicating that within several months from now the US will deliver nuclear strikes on Iran. For example, citing well-informed but undisclosed sources, the Kuwaiti Arab Times wrote that the US plans to launch a missile and bomb attack on the territory of Iran before the end of April, 2007. The campaign will start from the sea and will be supported by the Patriot missile defense systems in order to let the US forces avoid a ground operation and to reduce the efficiency of the return strike by “any Persian Gulf country”. Strategic Cultural Foundation (Russia) |
Russia Bares Its Military Teeth The American Government's Attitude Will Provoke Nuclear Re-armourment BBC News, October 2, 2003
A report by the Defence Ministry also called on Nato to review its strategy, warning that otherwise it would be necessary to pursue "a radical reconstruction of Russian military planning, including changes in Russian nuclear strategy". "Their [Russian missiles'] combat characteristics, including the surmounting of any systems of anti-missile defences, are unrivalled " Vladimir Putin Mr Putin has signed an agreement with US President George W Bush to cut the two countries' nuclear arsenals by two-thirds in 10 years. But many in Russia's military establishment are angry about former East Bloc allies joining Nato, as the Western alliance moves into traditional spheres of Russian influence. Iraq
lessons In an apparent reference to the US-led invasion of Iraq, Mr Ivanov said that the use of force without UN approval could encourage countries to acquire a nuclear potential. But he said that Russia could not rule out the use of force itself "if the interests of Russia or its alliance obligations demand it". Russia's new national security doctrine, unveiled last year, allows the use of all possible force, including nuclear weapons, to oppose attacks, if all other methods fail. Previously, Russia said it would only use nuclear weapons if its national sovereignty was under threat. Addressing Thursday's meeting, Mr Putin said Russia had "at her disposal a considerable... stockpile of heavy ground-launched strategic missiles...". "Their combat characteristics, including the surmounting of any systems of anti-missile defences, are unrivalled," he said. The president added that the arsenal included many strategic nuclear missiles never before deployed. |