Home

Terrorist Action and Threats?

Comment by Larry Ross, October 27, 2005

The following short, humorous piece raises some very profound and disturbing questions about the London bombings. Using the alleged terrorist action as justification, Tony Blair is trying to push draconian anti-terrorist laws through the UK Parliament. These proposed laws seem to have little real purpose in opposing and detecting terrorists. But they would be very effective in intimidating the public, silencing dissent, curtailing civil liberties, and generally increasing control of the general public. Tony Blair is deeply enmeshed in a web of deceit, using a tissue of lies to deceive the UK public and Parliament into supporting the illegal invasion, occupation and continued war on the Iraqi people. The Conservatives are right behind him, and labour stalwarts march in lock step behind Tony - they know not where, nor do they care. There is only a pitiful few Galloways to hold up the banner of British freedoms, liberty and truth with the guts to confront the serpents in their lairs - whether in Washington or London.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BBC's Panorama Is Due To Report On The London Bombings
In Their Programme Tonight.

Some Questions They Will Not Be Asking - And Certainly Not Answering:

Why, when the July 7, 07.40 Luton to London train was cancelled, did the police say that the bombers caught the 07.40 train?

(They made a mistake.)

With the next train arriving at Kings Cross at 08.42 how did the four bombers manage to reach the underground, board the different tubes, get into position and self-explode in 7 minutes?

(They were all athletes.)

Why, with the saturation CCTV coverage – entrances, escalators, platforms, carriages – of London Underground, was there no footage to be found of the suicide bombers?

(All of the cameras packed up at the same time.)

How did they find a still photograph of the four bombers from the CCTV coverage?

(The camera briefly righted itself; then went down again.)

Why does white-hat-man, in the photograph, in front of the railings, have a railing half-way through his face and cutting off his lower left arm?

(He had had a rough night.)

Why, with no previous connections to any militant groups did the suicide bombers choose to die and kill for Islam?

(They were all overnight converts.)

Why did the four pose for the CCTV cameras and carry wallets full of ID?

(They wanted their families, friends and the Muslim community to be identified, abused and harassed.)

Why did they not shout the standard Islamic proclamation, Allah Akhbar, before committing suicide and murder?

(They did not want to startle anyone.)

Why did they buy return tickets?

(In case they changed their minds.)

Why did they buy pay & display parking tickets?

(They did not want the hire car company to have to pay a fine.)

How were the 3 bombs detonated at precisely the same time without remote-controlled timers?

(Very accurate watches and a strict respect for punctuality.)

Why was the carriage floor damage in an upwards direction?

(The suicide bombers clung to the underside of the train.)

How did the police know so much so quickly?

(Extra-sensory perception.)

Why was Israeli Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, told not to leave his hotel room - Great Western, adjacent to Liverpool Street Station?

(A man was selling pork pies outside the hotel.)

Why did the suicide bus bomber go to back seat of the top deck?

(To minimise damage.)

Why was this No.30 bus the only bus to be re-directed, off its usual route, by the police?

(They had a premonition.)

Why did they not tell the passengers?

(They did not want to look silly if they were wrong.)

Why did the man who had just bought a new Mercedes commit suicide?

(He wished he had bought a Porsche.)

LET THAT BE AN END TO IT.

Source: info@namastepublishing.co.uk

Terrorism, as defined in Funk and Wagnalls
New Practical Standard Dictionary (1946) is as follows:

Why do you suppose the highlighted definition
no longer appears in modern dictionaries?