Home

George Bush Wars and The Future

by Larry Ross, December 28, 2005

It's amazing how Bush's popularity has sunk so low - to 35% approval. Yet he and his cronies can pretty much please themselves at U.S. taxpayers expense, and engage in endless wars for a few more years to come or escalates to a nuclear war.

I also am pro-America as indicated in my Xmas newsletter- Pro the real America, rather than pro-Bush who is exploiting his position to enrich his cronies and special interests. I believe Bush's actions hurt U.S. interests, not protect them. The evidence for this is massive.

The U.S. has always been able to buy the oil it needed from many sources around the world. It did not need to make war and steal Iraq's oil resources. Also, It can reduce it's own oil consumption by many methods anytime it wants. But Bush & Co. have no desire to cut U.S. oil consumption or devote many resources to developing alternative energy sources.

Bush's wars on terrorism are a counterproductive nonsense - making far more opponents (Bush calls them terrorists) then he kills.. There were many much more effective methods of hunting down and stopping so-called terrorists, by co-operation with U.S. friends and allies and their intelligence agencies. However that did not suit the Bush Administration which was bent on creating wars of conquest, camouflaged by their catch-all slogan of "Wars on terrorism". It works.

On this website, many articles deal with the real reasons for Bush's phoney war. Controlling mid-east oil resources
is one objective; expanding US global empire is another; creating wars (like Iraq) to feed the US military/industrial complex and Bush cronies is a third reason, creating an Orwellian-type of fascist/military state, that is self-perpetuating, controlled by Bush; his cronies and clone-like US Administrations ( Democratic or Republican) to follow, is a fourth reason. Their unfolding conspiracy has been well-planned and has worked well for them so far. Even the chaos they have created in Iraq, provides them with excuses to stay and use their new bases to consolidate their hold on Iraq, and as launching pads to attack neighbouring states like Iran and Syria, who they blame for 'helping Iraqi terrorists etc'. Using this technique of blaming neighbouring states for helping the victims of Bush's aggression, works well as an enabling method to justify a series of pre-planned U.S. wars to follow.

Bush's willingness to commit major war crimes and crimes against the US Constitution, then lie and fabricate excuses to justify it, has been an effective strategy for Bush. I think he'll use this type of strategy for his next war.

My prediction and I hope I'm wrong, is that Bush will stage an extreme event, probably involving the murder of Americans, that he will blame on Iran, in order to justify a war on Iran. So far the mass media have demonstrated that they will co-operate in repeating his lies and treating them like Papal Edicts, as they did and still do with his Iraq war lies.

Our Christchurch Press in New Zealand is a good example of an overseas-owned corporate media. They faithfully repeated his Iraq war lies long after everyone knew they were lies. Now, rather than apologise to their readers for the lies, they simply avoid the subject - on just report on the progress of Bush's war using embedded reporters, or reprints from The London Sunday Times - once a great paper, but now a pro-Bush propaganda Murdoch rag. They never use on-the-ground reporters who report the truth of the illegal carnage and mass bombing of civilians and what's really happening and why. The Press and it's ilk treat the Iraq war - and possibly the coming Iran war, as a perfectly acceptable and normal happening. Even routine. That is one technique the mass media use to guide the thinking of the population along the lines desired by their corporate masters. You will never find any outrage in the US, UK. NZ or Australian mass media about the crimes, illegal wars, D.U. weapon poisoning, growing dangers of nuclear weapons use, and any other extremes of the Bush Administration. For some reason these propaganda engines seem to love him, even though he heads a criminal regime threatening the world.

If he is as convincing as he was with his Iraq war lies, with media backing, he will fool the American public again; regain his lost popularity, and get congressional and popular support for the new war.(e.g. There was only 2 dissenting U.S. Senators who said "no" to Johnson's plan to escalate the Vietnam war, after using his phoney Gulf of Tonkin attack as a justification. Congress has proved to be very easy for an Administration to fool, and fooled repeatedly)

A lot will depend on how well Bush's event is planned, and how convincingly it comes across to people. As Hitler and his Nazis taught in Mein Kamp, 'the bigger the lie the more people will believe it'. Unfortunately this has proven to be true. People find it very difficult, or just refuse, to believe that their leader would commit outrageous crimes against his own people, in order to gain popularity and stay in power. However as the "Operation Northwood's" 1962 Pentagon plan
(on http:///www.nuclearfreenz.org.nz our website) demonstrates, U.S. Administrations have been willing to adopt extreme methods and crimes in order to get public approval for further crimes against selected targets. The entire Pentagon hierarchy approved of the extreme criminality of Operation Northwood's - in 1962! It's mind-boggling.

Just inventing all the lies to justify the pre-planned Iraq war, with over 1,000 US casualties so far, is in itself alone, a major conspiracy and crime against the U.S. Constitution and International law. The propaganda mass media will never mention that. But it is something that anyone can verify for themselves. Articles by writers who condemn all conspiracy theories are little more than unwitting, or witting, psychological warfare hacks. Check our "Psychological Warfare" on Google or our website to see the techniques used and the huge budget the U.S. devotes to fooling the public and planting phoney stories in co-operating media.

As I envisage it, the new event will probably be worse than the 9/11 attack, and give Bush the excuses he will use to quickly shut down and shut off any questions or doubts. In this environment he will be able to take giant steps to expand patriot-type laws toward a closely controlled U.S. fascist state. He can count on the US media again for all the support he needs to fool the US public. The new pre-planned Iran war is likely to follow within days, along with military conscription. Events will be fast moving, before people can get over the shock and start thinking again, and Bush will enjoy a new wave of popularity for again saving the conned US public and responding to the 'terrorist's attack'. Even though many Americans will know or suspect that this is another giant con by Bush, they will lack the will, organisation and resources to do much about it. Also, Bush with his new laws, and the giant apparatus of the newly-emerging US police state, will be able to legally smash and suppress whatever opposition there is. This is the way dictators operate - the way Hitler, Saddam and others dictators have operated.

I don't know why people believe it can't happen in the U.S.A. when there is so much evidence that it is already well along the way and there is such solid evidence of Bush crimes and conspiracies.. Unfortunately I think too many people are victims of the mass media, that package information on Bush wars and events to suit the needs of the Bush Administration. Or maybe it's just wishful thinking.

That's my thesis for today. Is it too far out for you? Does it look crazy? 2006 will show how right or wrong I was in my predictions.